halfoffdepot.com
 

Most Viewed

Top 6 articles this week:

Top Rated

Top 5 recent articles:

Advertisement
Half Off Depot Atlanta

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Why Mayor Franklin needs a psychological evaluation

“You have trouble handling anything that may be perceived as criticism.”—www.MayoClinic.com, on narcissistic personality disorder


Mayor Shirley Franklin attends a masked ball. Did she choose the peacock motif?
Spark St. Jude

By Stephanie Ramage

Mayor Shirley Franklin has spent the past few weeks sermonizing about the destructive power of angry words and how they reflect on the mental health of those who utter them.

Apparently, the mayor doesn’t listen to her own sermons. From besmirching reporters like me who criticize her policies, to saying, when she was running for office, that she would have "been better off to shoot” her ex-husband “than to divorce him,” Franklin’s remarks have raised some disturbing questions: Do her words convey the state of her own mental health, as she says is the case for others? Or does she, like narcissists and sociopaths, believe that life is a performance, that words and actions are merely means to an end, and that everyone else, and everything else, exists to fulfill her own goals? Is that why she finds it so easy to ignore harrowing reports of crime against the citizens she is supposed to look out for? What is her recent flurry of indignation really about? Paranoia? Insecurity? Guilt?
 
I’m not a shrink, but neither is Franklin, and since Franklin can order (via her lapdog Chief Pennington) someone who criticizes her, like Sgt. Scott Kreher, to get a psychological evaluation—which subsequently revealed him to be mentally healthy and entirely fit for duty—I decided I’m as qualified as anyone to say who might need to fill out an evaluation form at their friendly local mental health clinic.
 
I’m not, by the way, coming at this from as uninformed a position as the mayor has. I’ve done a cursory look around the psychiatric literature available on the Web, and found there are several mental illnesses that feature Franklin’s brand of blatant hypocrisy and her apparent feeling of being above reproach. And how else can one explain a mayor who unleashes the full fury of her authority on a police sergeant who comments that he’s sometimes so frustrated by the mayor’s failure to properly address the care of critically injured police officers that he would like to hit her in the head with a baseball bat? Especially when, according to a report in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution by the always impressive Bill Torpy, Franklin herself said of her ex-husband in 2002: “Do I talk to David Franklin? Yes. Do I know him? Yes. [But] I’m clearly on record that for my political career, I’d have been better off to shoot him than to divorce him.”
 
Now consider Franklin’s recent response to a citizen who asked her to accept Kreher’s apology and move on. The citizen signed his name as "Jeff" on an online petition to reinstate Kreher (you can find it at  HYPERLINK "http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/reinstatekreher/signatures.html" www.ipetitions.com/petition/reinstatekreher/signatures.html). 

Here’s Franklin’s response:
 
“Frankly, I believe threats of bodily harm from anyone are dangerous. As a 64-year-old woman I have witnessed violence resulting from anger that started with angry words. There is no excuse for threats of violence by anyone because they are upset. There are dozens of examples where this plays out around the world and thousands of women, men and children are killed and injured. To think an officer of the law has any right to be so upset he makes such a threat is to condone violence and encourage the disintegration of civil society. If he was that upset he should have stayed home and sought counseling. My response has no relationship to race, gender or ethnicity. Rather I believe his actions deserve strong and clear repudiation. I am ashamed that you condone threats and violence against anyone.”
 
Some domestic violence experts say that every year, 835,000 men are attacked by their girlfriends or wives, and they believe the true figure may actually be higher, since abused husbands are often too ashamed to tell anyone that their wives are battering them.
 
Let’s look at that Franklin quote again: “I’d have been better off to shoot him than to divorce him.”
 
Was Mayor Franklin making a real threat against her ex-husband? Of course not. Did she batter her husband? I would find that extremely hard to believe. As she told the AJC’s Torpy, the shooting remark was meant to express her frustration over the impact of her divorce on her political campaign.

Why then, does she find it so easy to excuse her own poor choice of words, and apparently impossible to accept the apology of a policeman who expressed his frustration though a similarly poor choice of words?

But Franklin took it even further. She had Kreher suspended, barring him from working extra jobs that he, like most Atlanta police officers, needs to support his family.
 
Is Franklin a narcissist?
 
Here’s a little info on narcissism from MayoClinic.com (emphasis mine):

“When you have narcissistic personality disorder … You have trouble handling anything that may be perceived as criticism. You may have a sense of secret shame and humiliation. And in order to make yourself feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and efforts to belittle the other person to make yourself appear better.”

It’s troubling that the most powerful political figure in the city of Atlanta is willing to go to great lengths to shame, defame and professionally damage her detractors in a bid to silence them. Her oversized reaction to critical remarks is frightening, considering that she has the power to order police officers onto the streets to do her bidding, order investigations of individuals, and even order psychological evaluations of city employees who stand up to her.

The City Council should, in the best interest of the citizens of Atlanta, as well as those who work and play in the city, order Mayor Franklin to undergo a psychological evaluation and suspend her, pending its results, just as Kreher was suspended. And, if the results merit it, ask for her resignation. SP

This column was modified from Stephanie Ramage’s June 10 entry on her Sundaypaper.com blog, The Ramage Report.

 

Rating:

A couple of important points on your artical. Unless critisim is given in a way that doesn't humiliate, and isn't just gviven out of spite, jealousy, and to make the giver of it feel more important, why wouldn't Ms. Shirley Franklin be justifed in being upset by it. Today people give unfair critisim without paying any attention to the facts the critism was given about. They also critisize to make themselves feel more important, but only prove they don't know what they're talking about and should only be ignored and laughted at.
Be carefull you don't copy what was done in the earas of the Witchcraft Trials and Mc Carthy. People unliked are always labeled viciously. It is as bad and rediculous as saying she's another Marie Antoinette careing more for an expensive costume then in doing things which show she really cares about the needs of citizens.
Certainly one way of showing she truly cares would be to fix the badly damaged sidewalks of Midtown, especially on Piedmont from Pine St. down on to 14th street.
However any and everyone in a position of authority, power and prestige, especially a politition is no good to anyone if they can't listen to advice or feedback from others. Just be sure the critisim was given in a way that doesn't
shame her unfairly, or given only to make it's giver feel more important.

Gayfrieda
Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:27 PM


Not to choose sides but I don't think barring the man from making a living and feeding his family is fair just because he may have "disagreed" with her policies and voiced his "displeasure" with the way she is handling business.She said it herself how she "couldn't wait 2 leave office" anyway EVERYBODY IS NOT GOING 2 KISS YOUR ASS SHIRLEY, just get over it...okay, your boo boo sticks just like everybody else's okay... just imagine what the world would be like if NOBODY stood up to BULLIES... I applaude him. And speaking of making threats, how is it okay for her to make threats about "shooting" her ex-husband whether she ment it or not but can't TAKE ANY CRITICISM when she gets called out?? If anything her ex-husband would've had a good excuse for causing her bodiliy harm since she left him for a "woman"... I'm just sayin' :)

trinabobeena
Sunday, June 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM


Not to choose sides but I don't think barring the man from making a living and feeding his family is fair just because he may have "disagreed" with her policies and voiced his "displeasure" with the way she is handling business.She said it herself how she "couldn't wait 2 leave office" anyway EVERYBODY IS NOT GOING 2 KISS YOUR ASS SHIRLEY, just get over it...okay, your boo boo sticks just like everybody else's okay... just imagine what the world would be like if NOBODY stood up to BULLIES... I applaude him. And speaking of making threats, how is it okay for her to make threats about "shooting" her ex-husband whether she ment it or not but can't TAKE ANY CRITICISM when she gets called out?? If anything her ex-husband would've had a good excuse for causing her bodiliy harm since she left him for a "woman"... I'm just sayin' :)

trinabobeena
Sunday, June 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM


You must be logged in to post a comment. You can log in here.

The Sunday Paper actively moderates site content.
Offensive material will be removed.
However, user comments on display do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Sunday Paper or its staff.

 
Advertisement
Art Institute
Advertisement
Zifty
Advertisement
Be well!
 
RSSTwitterFacebookMySpaceVirb